layer hidden off the screen
UCSB English Department HomeUCSB English Department HomeUCSB English Department Home
 
 
The Culture of Information
ENGL 25 — Winter 2002, Alan Liu
Notes for Class 22

This page contains materials intended to facilitate class discussion (excerpts from readings, outlines of issues, links to resources, etc.). The materials are not necessarily the same as the instructor's teaching notes and are not designed to represent a full exposition or argument. This page is subject to revision as the instructor finalizes preparation. (Last revised 3/3/02 )



Preliminary Class Business

  • Description of readings for next class
  • URLs for your online essays to Elizabeth by Friday, 5 pm
  • Reading Exam 2 on Friday, March 8th
 Next lecture section


Previous lecture section Next lecture section

Information as Identity

Images of identity in cyperspace:

There are two ways to view these images of information identity:

  • (1) One interpretation is that these are images of the people who inhabit the new information work as non-identities. Elements of this interpretation:

    • Computers are just calculating machines

      Sherry Turkle, "Who Am We?":

      "As recently as 10 to 15 years ago,  . . . The computer had a clear intellectual identity as a calculating machine. In an introductory programming course at Harvard University in 1978, one professor introduced the computer to the class by calling it a giant calculator." (p. 237)


    • Computer users are "nerds" and "geeks" (i.e., people with non-existent or socially under-developed identities)

    • Alternatively, computer users are themselves machine-like. They wear sunglasses that betray no identity or feeling. They are all like Keanu Reeves playing like Arnold Schwarzenegger as the "terminator." In a word, they are "cool."


  • (2) The other interpretation is the one that has been gaining ground in the past 10 or 15 years:

    • Once the computer became a machine of media (i.e., communications) and also a machine of work and power, then it obviously became more than a calculating machine.

    • The computer became a machine for making, changing, and experiencing human identity.

    • These are images of a new kind of identity in cyberspace.
Teaser: note the "Goth" look-and-feel of The Matrix: the sunglasses and coats; the coffins of the undead; the twisty, windy, spooky, or claustrophobic spaces.

 

Previous lecture section Next lecture section


Previous lecture section Next lecture section

What is Identity? — A Primer in the Contemporary Debate About Identity in the Humanities and Social Sciences

  • "Liberal individualism" in the Enlightenment "age of reason" (contrast modern identity and Freud)

  • Identity politics (contrast poststructuralist notions of identity)

  • Postmodern identity. Influential theories:

    • French poststructuralism—e.g., Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari on "schizoanalysis" and "deterritorialization

    • "Hybridity" theory in race, gender, and postcolonial studies

    • Artificial-intelligence studies and the "society of the mind" thesis (e.g., Marvin Minsky)

    • Cyborg theory:

      Donna Haraway, "A Manifesto for Cyborgs"

      "Irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true. . . . By the late twentieth century, . . . we are all chimeras, theorized and fabricated hybrids of machine and organism; in short we are cyborgs." (p. 28)

      Hybridization of boundaries between (1) human and animal, (2) human and machine, (3) matter and pure spirit (see pp. 29-31)


      Cf., Bruno Latour on technology in We Have Never Been Modern
Previous lecture section Next lecture section


Previous lecture section Next lecture section

What is Identity? — The Difference Computers Make

  • Sherry Turkle's psychological research into the interactions of users with computers and her "windows" of "identity" metaphor (pp. 236-37, 242-43 in Trend)

  • The influential paradigm of the MUD

  • Julian Dibbell's 1993 article in the Village Voice on "A Rape in Cyberspace"

The computer appears to make possible the implementation of theories of postmodern identity.

Who are "you" in a MUD (or chatroom, or Usenet group, or even e-mail listserv) where:

  • You have no necessary body
  • You have no necessary name
  • You have no necessary gender
  • You have no necessary race
  • You have no necessary age
  • You have no necessary social group with which you are identified

Is there a "you" online at all, or does making a "you" require reconstituting a facsimile of the "RL" rules of gender, race, age, etc. that anchors you as a "you"?

(continued in next lecture) Previous lecture section Next lecture section

Previous lecture section

References

  • Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari
    • Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1983) [pub. in French, 1972]
    • A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1987)
  • Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1993)
  • Marvin Minsky, The Society of Mind (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986)
  • Marvin Minsky and Harry Harrison, The Turing Option (New York: Warner Books, 1992)

 

Previous lecture section