The Graduate Program
First Qualifying Exam
Roundtable
Friday, October 17, 2003
|
|
|
|
Student panelists:
Sarah McLemore, Eric Nebeker, Steven Sohn
Faculty panelists:
E. Cook, Carl Gutierrez-Jones, Michael O’Connell
Sarah McLemore:
-
Sarah spoke first and provided a very
comprehensive handout which you all got. I won’t
reproduce it here but if you need copies, see me. I will
be working on getting it posted to the graduate portion
of the website.
Steve Sohn:
- Be confident in the exam…you know more than you think.
- Reading groups provide great incentive and keep you
on track and working hard
- Mock exams are great preparation but remember, they
are sometimes more difficult than the exam itself!
- Give yourself some decompression time…2 days before
the exam you won’t be learning any new material at this
point so have some fun and try to relax.
- Your physical presentation is important. Dress nicely
and in dark colors to avoid sweat stains!
- Create some review sheets (he handed out examples, see
me for copies)
- In choosing your three areas, even if you haven’t read
much from a certain area but area very interested in it,
choose it…your interest will compel you to do well. Don’t
pick areas just because you’ve already read some of the
material.
- Don’t be cocky about the area you think you know best.
Steve did the best in the area he felt he knew the least
about.
Eric Nebeker:
- His heavy reading period took place in the winter and
spring before his spring exam
- Visit your examiners and listen to their advice and
suggestions…see them while you are doing your reading
rather than waiting until you are reviewing what you’ve
read
- Be prepared to improvise. You may be asked to think
about a text in a way you haven’t prepared for. Examiners
seemed to want to get a sense of how well he could talk
about certain texts.
- He didn’t participate much in reading groups as they
were too time consuming but he felt that there was value
in the fact that they force you to talk about the texts.
- Don’t stress any more than you need to about getting
the reading done. Exam situation was not that scary…was
comfortable and not threatening. Enjoy it as much as
possible
- Don’t be so self-conscious about everything you say.
If you say something dumb, move on! If stumped by a question,
be honest.
Carl Gutierrez-Jones:
- Faculty wants you to succeed. Think of exam as a pedagogical
moment—like walking into a classroom to teach, you can
have your own agenda. The major value of the exam happens
outside the examining room…don’t have the goal of all
you’re studying be just the completion of a 2-hour exam.
- Save all the notes you take while studying and use them
for when you are interviewing for jobs.
- Check on availability of reading materials as soon as
you know what areas you are reading in. Some texts can
be very hard to find.
- Use a layered note-taking system
- In addition to books, have access to literary history.
The interpretation of the texts demands that you know
the surrounding history. Spend time with criticism on
some of these texts.
- There will be many styles of questions depending on
your examiners. Some will be character questions, some
plot questions and questions that define the field. You
will be expected to connect texts. Try to lock onto key
passages in texts.
E. Cook:
- Emphasis for faculty is testing the breadth of the field
and the range of texts read. Questions might relate to
how each text fits into the field. Don’t be surprised
if you are cut-off in mid-speech…examiners are looking
for coverage not specific details.
- Build rhetorical structures to fall back on…crutches
devised to enhance performance
- Remember that you will most likely be teaching this
material at some point and consider it as a kind of savings
bank of useful material that will be used beyond the 2-hour
exam.
Michael O’Connell:
- The idea that you can actually enjoy the exam is great
and more realistic than thinking of it as a frightening
time. At its best it is a civilized conversation about
the texts that you have read.
- What faculty is looking for is someone they can imagine
successfully teaching the material at a later date. Think
of the work you are doing as building up a fund of information
that you will use at a later date.
- Visit the examiners and try not to dwell on anticipating
what type of questions they will ask.
- Make connections among texts and writers as well as
contrasts and relationships between style and theme.
Question/answer time:
Is it appropriate to talk about a text that isn’t on
the list? Yes, as long as there is a connection between
the question and the text and you are still productively
answering the question. Make sure you don’t look like you
are dodging the question.
What if I can’t finish reading all the texts? There
will be texts you can’t get through. Make sure you know
something about those texts even if you can actually read
the whole thing. Must have some physical contact with all
the texts…remember, faculty teach material they aren’t completely
familiar with all the time. Work out ways of mastering
as many of the texts as you can.
Will there be questions relating two fields or is each
field separate from the others?
Asking a question that relates two fields would be an exception
but could happen. More likely is that you will be asked
to connect themes across the lists.
For setting up mock exams, get in touch with Steven Deng,
sdeng@english.ucsb.edu.
|
|
|