Establishing
a Good Relationship
The
key to finishing your dissertation is a good
working relationship with your advisor...
problems with your research can be frustrating,
but problems with your advisor can be fatal
to your degree. On the other hand, a good
relationship as co-researcher can be of long
term mutual benefit to you both. But don't
expect your advisor to structure the interaction,
energize the relationship, or resolve advising
problems. Relating well is entirely up to
you.
Most
advisors are interested in coworking with
bright people on ground-breaking research--that's
why they became graduate professors. But
they aren't particularly interested in working
with students, or on student research projects.
Moreover, few professors really enjoy dissertation
advising. That's not what they were trained
to do, not what they were hired to do, and
usually not what they want to do.
In
academia, advising gets little credit toward
salary increases, promotions, or prestige,
so few professors feel it's important. The
result is, they lack motivation to advise
well, and are diffident about their advising
relationships. It's your advisor's lack of
involvement with the advising role that places
sole responsibility with you to set up and
sustain a good advising relationship.
Setting
Expectations
To
generate a good relationship, you need to hold
reasonable expectations for your advisor's role
functions, as well as his or her attitudes and
behaviors. Without understanding your advisor's
role, you won't know what to ask for. Without perspective
on appropriate attitudes and behaviors, you won't
know how to evaluate your advisor's performance.
Moreover, without balanced expectations, you're
liable to be easily disappointed without cause,
and you won't sense if your advisory relationship
starts to sputter.
As
important as it is, achieving realistic expectations
is difficult, mainly because there's a woeful lack of
recognized advising standards against which to gauge
your interaction.
Lack
of Advising Standards
Most
institutions don't define reasonable expectations of
advisors. Other than a general code of ethics and a quota
on how many students advisors can supervise, most don't
set standards for advising, and don't monitor the process.
The few available guidelines are generalized role descriptions
(e.g., meet with students as needed, read and return
drafts in reasonable time, monitor students' progress,
etc.). This allows advisors considerable latitude in
carrying out their advising duties, of which they take
full advantage.
Recognizing
the vacuum in standards, ASGS presents a group of "reasonable
expectations" in this issue, derived from numerous
authorities and years of working with students and advisors.
Armed with these--preferably at the outset of your advisory
relationship--you can discuss with your advisor what
your expectations are. If there's a difference of opinion,
you can negotiate (or find another advisor). Later, your
knowledge of reasonable expectations will help you detect
hints of problems as they arise, and give you a better
perspective on how to solve them.
The
Imbalance of Power
To
keep your advising relationship humming over the several
years a dissertation takes, you must perceive and resolve
problems as they arise. Solving these problems is touchy.
The power imbalance between you and your advisor limits
your course of action. Practically speaking, you need
to start with a positive, businesslike attitude toward
your advisor and make changes and improvements, using
suggestion and negotiation. But you also need to keep
your advisor's role in perspective. Advisors traditionally
convey the notion that they're all-powerful, that they're
doing students a favor by advising them, and that students
have no option but to kowtow to their wishes. Advisors
promote these ideas to retain their near totalitarian
control over the advising process, and students believe
them.
The
facts are, advisors do have final approval over the dissertation,
but they're not all-powerful; they can be influenced,
and they can be replaced. Professors are not doing graduate
students a favor by advising them. Even if advisors aren't
rewarded for it directly, they're paid to advise students
along with their other professorial duties. Students
pay their institutions, and through them, their advisors,
for advice they receive. Moreover, unquestioning acceptance
of the "suggestions" of an advisor can scuttle
your dissertation. You may have a better grasp of your
topic than your advisor does, and you'll probably remember
your study better from one meeting to the next. If you
blindly follow your advisor's directions, you might get
hopelessly confused, or worse, you may begin to feel
the dissertation isn't yours, and lose motivation to
finish.
It's
Up to You
Students
naturally focus on the advising relationship more than
their advisors do, and the more successful students take
control of it. Knowing the operating procedures for relating
well with your advisor helps you get the advice and support
you need. In the area of advising, professors don't come
with batteries included. We suggest you start winding
that key.
The
Dissertation Advisor User's Manual is extracted from Dissertation News No. 8. Other
articles in this issue include: |