|
English 10 Toolkit
Constructing a Toolkit for English
10
Introduction to the English 10 Toolkit
English 10 Syllabus - Sheridan Blau, Fall
2001
English 10 Syllabus - Carol Pasternack
English 10 Syllabus - Sumita Lal
English 10: The Interpretive Project:
Poetry - Sheridan Blau
English 10: Interpretive or Critical
Paper on Short Fiction - Sheridan Blau
English 10: Topics for Paper 2 -
Diana Solomon
English 10 : New Historicist
Essay - Caron Pasternack
English 10: Explication
Essay - Carol Pasternack
Peer Review Sheet for Decades Project
Constructing
a Toolkit for English 10 …
English 10 will be a required course for undergraduates
entering the English major in, or after, the Fall
quarter of 2002.
This is a selection of syllabi and assignments taken from
the English 10 Tooolkit which
is preserved in Dana Spoonerow’s office to help you when
planning your own English 10 Course.
What works? What Doesn’t? Contribute your own ideas to
this eternal work in progress.
February 20, 2002
Introduction
to the English 10 Toolkit
As a result of the undergraduate meetings
of 2000-2001, it was decided that the following statement
be used as a guideline for teachers of English 10:
"English 10 should teach students to interpret a variety
of literary works, including poetry, enabling them to participate
in the discourse of literary studies. In practical terms,
the course will teach students to do close readings, to
develop an interpretation of a text, to use evidence from
the text to support their interpretations, and to shape
essays appropriate to upper-division literature classes.
In addition, instructors may also wish to teach students
how historical context affects the meaning of a text, how
to read critical essays and use them in their own interpretive
essays, how to revise their own writing, and how different
critical approaches (or theories) ask different questions
of a text and produce different interpretations. Students
will be expected to develop their writing throughout the
term and produce a series of essays, totaling approximately
4,000 words.
The literary content of the course will be decided by the
individual instructors, with some emphasis on poetry. Instructors
are encouraged to teach the fundamental vocabulary of literary
analysis and the basics of MLA style."
The following course description was submitted for English
10, effective Fall 2002, and appears
in the catalog as such:
"Acquaints students with purposes
and tools of literary interpretation. Introduces
techniques and vocabulary of analytic discussion and critical
writing. Some emphasis will be on poetry with attention
also to drama, essay and the novel."
S. D. Blau
Fall, 2001
ENGLISH 10: INTRODUCTION TO LITERATURE
Texts: The Norton Anthology of Poetry
The Story and Its Writer (5th Ed), ed. Ann Charters
Sharon Olds, The Gold
Cell
Additional readings, TBA
Reading Assignments
The readings assigned for this course will include a large
body of work selected by the instructor and a somewhat smaller
body of work selected by students. All of the instructor's
selections and some of the student-selected work will become
part of our shared syllabus and serve as common texts for
discussions and critical experiments in class. This common
body of texts will include representative poems and poets
from various periods of English and American literary history;
all the poems in Sharon Olds' The Gold Cell, a broadly
representative selection of short stories; plus some additional
readings assigned to provide critical and cultural contexts
for the assigned literary works and to introduce particular
theoretical or critical perspectives.
Writing Assignments
A. Reading Log. Every student will
be required to maintain a reading log to record impressions
of, responses to, and reflections on assigned and self-selected
literary works as they are being read and studied and at
the conclusion of each reading. These logs should be useful
to you in several ways. First, they will help you to notice
what you notice as you read -- the first step toward becoming
an independent and powerful reader. Recording what you notice
in your log will also help you discover the value of your
own impressions, observations, questions, and other responses
as starting points for discussions of literary works. Your
log will also provide you with a place to do some low-stakes
writing, experimenting with critical approaches and new
strategies of analysis introduced to you in this course.
Finally, the responses, reflections, and experiments recorded
in your log will serve as a reservoir of ideas and first
draft writing you can draw upon for the public and more
formal papers you will be asked to submit during the quarter.
Although your log is largely a private document, written
primarily for your own use, you will be asked occasionally
to share some entries with classmates and to allow your
instructor to audit your logging work. Your log entries
will document your reading for the course.
Your log will be of most use to you as a resource and as
a record of your reading if you will carefully date each
entry and make it clear what text or segment of text you
are writing about. So that you might periodically turn in
sections of your log, it is wise to use a loose-leaf binder
for your log.
B. Papers:
1. A Reading Autobiography. An informal
account of your history as a reader from your earliest experiences
to your current reading practices, including observations
about what and how you read and how you learned to do what
you do as a reader.
(Due Wed.Oct. 3)
2. Reading Process Research Report. This paper will
be an informal research report on your own mental processes
as you attempt to read and make sense of an assigned short
poem. The idea will be for you to conduct an informal research
study of yourself as a reader of a difficult text. Your
paper will be an account of what you do as a reader from
the first time you look at a poem until you complete what
you regard as a satisfactory reading of it or the best reading
you think you can manage in the time you are willing to
give to it. Your report must also include a reflection on
what your self-study reveals about you as a reader or about
the particular demands of the work you are reading or about
the reading process in general. A good research tool for
you to use might be that of the think-aloud protocol, a
transcript or portions of a transcript of a tape recording
of you thinking out loud as you engage in the process of
reading and trying to
figure out a poem. In class we'll
examine some ways of engaging in this sort of study. The
poem to be used for this study will be announced in class.
Additional guidelines for this paper will follow. (Due Mon.
Oct. 15)
3. Commentaries. These are brief (1-2 pp.) observations,
reflections, or critical comments (possibly built on log
entries, but revised as more considered contributions to
a class discussion) on selected literary works. Your first
commentary will be written on a poem you will be nominating
for inclusion in our syllabus (see below). Others will be
required as the course progresses.
4. Two Interpretive/Critical Papers. These papers
may be interpretive or critical or both. In an interpretive
paper you might examine and attempt to illuminate any text
or set of texts or portion of a text (a short poem or a
short passage from a story, for example) that may be said
to be interpretively problematic. The purpose of such a
paper would be more to reveal and explore a problem rather
than solve it, although solutions or possible solutions
would be welcome. In a critical paper you might discuss
how a particular work of literature (or two or more works
considered together) achieves or fails to achieve its effects,
or you might evaluate what it accomplishes philosophically,
or analyze how it reflects or enacts or subverts particular
cultural or aesthetic values or contexts. Further guidelines
will be discussed in class. (Due dates TBA, approx wks 5
& 9).
C. Experiments and Exercises. We will conduct
a number of in-class experiments in writing poetry and prose
and responding to literary texts in a variety of ways. Save
everything you write for possible use in a paper and for
submission (revised or unrevised) with your portfolio (see
below).
D. Portfolio. At the end of the quarter and
at midterm time each student will submit for evaluation
a portfolio of all written work produced for the course
during the quarter. Portfolios will include introductions
to the work submitted and retrospective reflections on the
body of reading and writing completed. Midterm and final
grades will be based largely on the quality and quantity
of the material submitted in the portfolio. Guidelines for
preparing portfolios for submission will be provided separately.
Contact Information:
Sheridan Blau
Office: South Coast Writing Project
Blgd 402, Rm. 215 (Arts & Lectures Ticket Office Blgd.)
(805) 893-2510. For appointments call 893-3218 or 4422
<sherblau@aol.com>
<blau@education.ucsb.edu>
Assignments for First 3 Weeks:
Wed. Sept 26. The Goldilocks Assignment.
Select three poems from our poetry anthology: one that's
too hard, one that's too easy, and one that's just right.
Write entries in your log on all three poems and write an
additional reflection on what makes a poem difficult. Bring
the three poems to class and be prepared to discuss the
reasons for their difficulty or simplicity.
Wed. Oct. 3. Reading Autobiography
Sept. 26-Oct. 8. Start looking
in the first two weeks of class for two poems in our anthology
that do not appear on the assigned list (below) but that
you think deserve to be on our syllabus as poems everybody
should read or will want to read. At least one of these
poems must be new to you, one you have never studied before.
You will undoubtedly have to read many poems to find two
that you would recommend as required reading for all of
your classmates. So use the opportunity to write about at
least some of the candidate poems (surely those you select
and some that you reject) in your reading log. Be prepared
by Oct. 8 to introduce your top choice to other readers
by helping them to understand the poem and why you selected
it. (Don't hesitate to read other poems by the same poet
and check the biographical note in your text for useful
information you might want to provide). Turn your notes
and ideas about your first choice poem into a short written
introduction to the poem or commentary on the poem.
Turn in your written commentary on Oct. 8.
Mon. Oct. 15. The reading process research
report.
Weeks 1-3. Read as many of the following 60 short poems
(all from The Norton Anthology
of Poetry and listed here in approx.
reverse chron order) as possible:
Li-Young Lee, "Persimmons"
Dionisio Martinez, 2 poems
Audre Lord, "Hanging Fire"
Gwendolyn Brooks, 9 very short poems
Robert Hayden, "Those Winter Sundays"
Stanley Kunitz, "Touch Me"
W. H. Auden, "Musee de Beaux Artes"
Langston Hughes, "Theme for English B"
Robinson Jeffers, "Carmel Point"
William Carlos Williams, 6 very short poems
Edwin Arlington Robinson, "Richard Cory," "Reuben
Bright"
A. E. Housemen, "To an Athlete Dying Young"
Gerard Manley Hopkins, "The Windhover,"
"Pied Beauty," "Spring
and Fall"
Thomas Hardy, "Hap"
Emily Dickinson, #185, 241, 249, 254,303,435, 465, 1129
Robert Browning, "My Last Duchess"
Wm Wordsworth, "Composed Upon Westminster Bridge,"
"My Heart Leaps Up"
Andrew Marvell, "To His Coy Mistress"
Richard Lovelace, "To Lucasta,
Going to the Wars"
George Herbert, "The Altar," "Easter Wings,"
"Prayer I," "The Flower"
Ben Jonson, "On My First
Son"
John Donne, "Song," "Woman's Constancy,"
"The Sun Rising," "A Valediction Forbidding
Mourning," "The Flea," "Elegy 19...,"
plus Holy Sonnets #5, #7, #10
Christopher Marlowe, "The Passionate Shepherd to His
Love"
Sir Walter Raleigh, "The Nymph's Reply-," "The
Passionate Man's Pilgrimage"
Thomas Wyatt, "They Flee from Me"
Anon (15th Cent), "Western Wind"
Syllabus: Introduction to Literary Study
Professor
Carol Pasternack
Office: 2704 South Hall, 893-8429
E-Mail:
cpaster@humanitas.ucsb.edu
Office Hours: Mon. 1-2, Wed. 2-3,
URL: http://archserve.id.ucsb.edu/eng110/cp/ep.htm
or by appointment
Requirements:
• Attendance and Participation in all
class meetings.
• Always have the assigned reading completed before class and bring
the appropriate books. • Missing and/or not participating
in classes will undoubtedly affect how well you learn the
skills being taught. Missing and/or not participating in
a substantial number of meetings (3) may lower your grade;
missing more may result in a failing grade.
• If you miss a class, you are responsible for finding out from a
classmate what you missed before asking the instructor.
If you are missing class because of a personal or family
crisis, please consult with the instructor.
• For many meetings,
you will be asked to do specific analytical tasks as preparation.
You will be asked to hand these in.
·
Attendance
at at least one special meeting:
a showing of the film Zoot Suit.
• Participation in all group work, including
acting as reader for members of your writing group and a
group conference with the instructor (20%). Much of this
work will be done on the Web.
• Quizzes, including culminating quiz on last
day of class (20%).
• Three essays written in successive versions,
with the assistance of your draft group. For each, you will
post each paper, receive comments from your group, and post
a revised-version. For whichever two you choose at the end
of the term, you will also post an ultimate version, for
which will receive a grade (each worth 30%).
NOTE WELL:
Plagiarism
will not be tolerated in this class. Using the words or
ideas of another person without the proper citation is a
crime. Possible penalties include failure of the assignment,
failure of the course, or even expulsion from the university.
All cases will be reported to the Dean.
Also
note: This syllabus
is subject to revision.
Texts:
• Reader at Grafikart,
6547 Pardall in Isla Vista
• M. H. Abrams, A
Glossary of Literary Terms
• R. S. Gwynn, Poetry:
A Longman Pocket Anthology, 2nd edition
• Steven Lynn, Texts and Contexts
Writing About Literature with Critical Theory, 2nd
edition.
• Langston Hughes, Selected Poems
• Leslie Marmon
Silko, Storyteller
• Dept. of English, UCSB, Success in English
Courses
• Optional: Diana Hacker, A
Pocket Style Manual
Calendar
The Text Itself
R Jan 7: Meaning and Pleasure. Translation
(into prose) and loss (of meaning and pleasure).
Millay, "Still will I harvest beauty where it grows" (R); Keats,
"On first looking into Chapman's Homer" (110);
Lee, "Eating Together" (329). Begin writing
sample in class.
T Jan 12: Writing sample due: "The Purposes
and Pleasures of Poetry: My Thoughts" ( 2-3 pp. Should be your own ideas but organized into an essay,
with specific examples, if possible of quoted phrases or
lines. Proofread!). The rose. Herrick,
"To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time" (56); Edmund
Waller, "Song: Go, Lovely Rose!" (59-60); Robert
Burns, "A Red, Red Rose" (82). Abrams, "Figurative
Language," "Imagery," "Lyric."
Excerpts from Wirmatt, "The Concrete
Universal" (R) on metaphor and role of critic.
Advice: Read
around in the anthology to choose the poem you want to write
your essay about, due on Jan. 29.
R Jan 14: Against roses. Shakespeare, "My
mistress eyes are nothing like the sun" (48); Millay,
"Say what you will, and scratch my heart to find"
(R); Parker, "One Perfect Rose" (199); Ana Castillo,
"Women Are Not Roses" (R). Bring in a paragraph
about the rose metaphor in one of the poems. The paragraph
should be on a diskette (see below) and
in a hard copy.
11 a.m. class moves to Pentium 333 Lab (Phelps
1526). Upload explication of a metaphor. Bring Your
paragraph on Q diskette
formatted for IBM-compatible machine, in "text"
or "ascii" format or "html" (see "Manual").
T Jan 19: Against roses, continued:
Modeling in metaphors. Abrams, "Symbol." The
sonnet's confines. Millay, "I will put chaos into fourteen lines" (R).
Also read Spenser, "One day I wrote her name"
(43); Sidney, "Loving in truth and fain in verse my
love to show" (43-4); Shakespeare, "When to the
sessions of sweet silent thought" (46-7); Donne, "Batter
my heart, three-personed God"
(53); Milton, "When I consider how my light is spent"
(61); Cullen, "Yet do I marvel" (206). Read Abrams,
"Alliteration," "Rhyme," "Sonnet."
Workshop on the senses of sound.
Bring to class a paragraph on a central metaphor in the
poem you have chosen for your Explication Essay.
R Jan 21: The difference of rhythm (scansion
as an interpretive tool). Donne, "Death be not proud"
(53); Owen, "Dulce et Decorum
Est" (198-9); Thomas, "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night" (221); Brooks, "We Real Cool"
(226). Abrams, "Meter"; Scholes,
"Music" (R) Workshop on scansion of quatrains;
discussion of the difference the rhythms make. Bring to
class revised paragraph on metaphor, with discussion of
sound incorporated into the discussion of metaphor.
T Jan 26: New Criticism. Read the "Introduction"
and "Critical Worlds" in Lynn, Texts and Contexts,
to get an idea of the range of methods possible for
critical writing. Then read closely Lynn's chapter, "Unifying
the Work" and Abrams, "New Criticism." Also
read closely Gwendolyn Brooks, "the mother" (225-6,
and included in Lynn's chapter). We will discuss, "What
important aspects of the poem has Lynn omitted in his sample
essay on `the mother'?" Quiz 1.
R Jan 28: Thesis workshop. Bring in draft
of your explication essay with thesis paragraph and also
a paragraph that uses rhythm or other aspect(s) of sound
to help explicate meaning.
Fri., Jan. 29: First version of Explication Essay due on the Web. Lab hours:
3-5, Pentium 333 Lab, Phelps 1526.
The Text and Its Readers: You and Others
T Feb 2: Barbie and You. Lynn,
"Creating the Text" (to p.56); Cisneros, "Barbie-Q";
Soto, "Barbie. " For
one of the Barbie stories, write down your personal response;
in class, we will broaden that to "the implied reader's"
response. Abrams, "Reader Response." Also, Schweickart, "Reading Ourselves"
(R).
R Feb 4: Point of View: Whose? Paredes, "Macaria's Daughter" (R); Cisneros,
"Woman at Hollering Creek" (R). - Comments
due on Explication Essays. You and the
Library. Lynn, "Investigating the Work"
(to p. 222). At 11 a.m., we will move to the Library, Room
1414C.
Mon., Feb. 8: Revision of Explication Essay due.
T Feb 9: Reading the Other. Viramontes, "The Cariboo Cafe" (R).
Mazon, "Introduction,"
The Zoot-Suit Riots (R).
R Feb 11: Viewing the Other. Zoot
Suit: Maz6n, "The Sleepy Lagoon Case,"
The Zoot-Suit Riots (selections)
(R). Abstract due of one critical or theoretical
essay, on disk.
T Feb 16: Viewing Gender., Zoot Suit:
Scholes, "The Elements
of Film" (R). Lynn,. "Investigating the Work" (remainder of chapter).
Thesis workshop.
Wed., Feb. 17: First version of "Researched Reader"
essay
Texts and Their Contexts
R Feb 18: The Codes of Race. Langston Hughes, "Afro-American
Fragment" (3), "The Negro Speaks of Rivers"
(4), "Aunt Sue's Stories" (6), "Negro"
(8), "October 16" (10), "As I Grew Older"
(11), "Dream Variations" (14), "Song for
a Dark Girl" (172), "The South" (173), "Bound
No'th Blues" (174). Abrams,
"Free Verse." George S. Schuyler, "The Negro-Art
Hokum" (R); Hughes, "The Negro Artist and the
Racial Mountain" (R), Gates, "Writing, Race, and
the Difference It Makes" (R). Homework: in your own
words, write down the thesis for each essay, Schuyler'
s, Hughes's, and Gates's.
Quiz 2.
Mon., Feb. 22: Comments due on "RR" essay.
T Feb 23: The Idea of Harlem. Hughes,
"The Weary Blues" (33), "Morning After"
(43), "Harlem Night Song" (61), "Trumpet
Player" (114), "Widow Woman" (139); Nathan
Irvin Huggins, "Introduction" and "Harlem" (R). Homework: In your
own words, what is the thesis that Huggins advances? What
is one method he uses to persuade you of its truth? In class:
Blues tape.
R Feb 25: Bebopped. Lynn, "Connecting the Text." Abrams, "New Historicism."
Hughes, Montage of a Dream Deferred, through
"Tag"; Walter C. Farrell, Jr. and Patricia A.
Johnson, "Poetic Interpretations of Urban Black Folk
Culture" (R). What is the thesis of Farrell and Johnson's
essay? What are its concerns? In class: bop tape.
Fri., Feb. 26: Revision of "RR" essay due.
T Mar 2: Hughes, Montage,
"Theme for English B" through end. Thurgood
Marshall, "The Legal Attack. . ." (R 2916); See
also: Ralph J. Bunche, "The Programs . . . "
(R). Homework: What codes of race does Hughes create/draw
on? How does Marshall contribute to/draw on codes of race?
In class: workshop on a thesis re. codes of race in the 1940s.
Optional related texts in the Reader: Alain Locke, "The
New Negro"; Malcohn X, "Saved" from The Autobiography of
Malcohn X; Miguel Covarrubias,
"The Aframerican Cakewalk";
Carl G. Jung, "Your Negroid and Indian Behavior";
Hughes, "Slave on the Block"; James Baldwin, "Sonny's
Blues."
R Mar 4: Storyteller (read at least
through p. 42, eventually the whole book); Silko, "Language and Literature from a Pueblo Indian
Perspective" (R).
T Mar 9: Storyteller;
Paula Gunn Allen, "The Sacred Hoop: A Contemporary
Perspective" (R).
Wed., Mar. 10: First version of New Historicist essay due.
R Mar 11: Storyteller.
Fri., Mar. 12: Comments on New Historicist essay due.
Mon., Mar. 15: Revised New Historicist essay due.
T Mar 16: Storyteller.
R Mar 18: Course conclusion and Quiz 3 (cumulative).
Mon., Mar. 22: Ultimate drafts due on Web.
English 10 - Introduction to Literary Study
Instructor: Sumita Lall
Course hours: TA
12:30 - 2:10,
HSSB 1237 (enroll# 15156)
Office Hours: R 2:15 to 4:15, South Hall 3432 H (green
door)
Mailbox: South Hall, Sankey
Room (across from 2617)
Email:
s114tAumai1.ucsb.edu (checked only on TWR from 9-4)
(NB
the instructor reserves the right to make changes to this
document.)
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This
course introduces students to various literary genres (i.e.
fiction, poetry, drama), approaches
or methods of literary analysis, and conflicting ideas expressed
in prose about the value of studying literature. Students
are exposed to different literary forms (e.g. the American
short story, Victorian prose and poetry, contemporary multicultural
poetry, the Theatre of the Absurd, the screenplay, and the
postcolonial novel) while they are encouraged to develop
an understanding of the different codes or contexts (e.g.
aesthetic, economic, political, historical, theoretical)
that inform both literary production and reception. The
students' exposure to different texts and forms of analysis
will help them to learn key literary terms, and they will
learn how to apply this new vocabulary to literary texts
in their own readings and in their discussions with fellow
classmates.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
This course will prepare students
to assume active or participant roles in the literary community
by making them familiar with - and, therefore, initiating
them into - the study of literature. Students will learn
how effectively to communicate their ideas and intuitions/feelings
about the literature they read for the course.
The course's overall intent is to
encourage students, by way of exposure to a wide range of
literary texts and to many of the
concerns and debates within the discipline, to formulate
their own arguments about the aesthetic, political, and/or
cognitive value of literature.
In very simple terms, students should
leave this course with the ability to:
a) read literature "actively"
(i.e. read and reread texts slowly, ask appropriate questions,
research unfamiliar textual references, take notes recording
a set of impressions in a reading log or in the margins
of the text);
b) analyze the literature "logically" (i.e. compare
and contrast the use of literary devices, make meaningful
connections between references in the text or between texts
written by different authors);
c) write about the literature "critically"
(i.e. develop interesting claims, make arguable points,
attempt to answer a set of questions raised during the reading
process, understand and apply theoretical approaches, provide
comprehensive commentary on ambiguous meanings, TAKE RISKS!!!).
COURSE REQUIREMENTS and GRADE BREAKDOWN:
(Important dates: Feb 5 and 19; Mar 5 and March 18)
Class
Participation ... 10%: You are required to keep up with
daily reading assignments and to come to class prepared
to contribute to class discussions. If you know yourself
to be particularly shy in group settings, you MUST still
contribute to discussion by taking advantage of alternative
forms of communication (e.g. via email or by submitting
reading logs).
Quizzes and In-class writing ... 5%: There will be a number of "surprise" quizzes
that will involve in-class writing. These quizzes will test
for basic reading comprehension (i.e. your ability to identify
the text's main characters, basic themes, key moments in
terms of the plot, etc.), but they will sometimes also ask
for a "critical" response to a passage or to the
set of works we are reading for that day.
Midterm ... 15%:
For the midterm (Feb 19), you will be expected to interpret
- using short-answer form - various passages from the literature
we will have covered up until the exam. The midterm will
also ask you to identify important literary terms (from
M.H. Abrams' A Glossary of Literary Terms) and
other concepts discussed in lecture.
Two
Papers ... 20% and 25% (total 45%): The first paper (due Feb 5) will
be a 5-6 page "literary" interpretation of a short
story, either John Steinbeck's "The Chrysanthemums"
OR John Updike's "A&P." The paper should consider
the many literary devices that the writer uses in his fiction,
and it should also formulate an argument about the short
story in question. The second paper (due Mar 5) will be
a 5-6 page "literary" interpretation of a poem
that the student will select from the unit on "Multicultural
Poetry" (Reader 85-114). It should demonstrate
the student's proficiency in reading poetry (i.e. the student
should attend both to the language and to the thematic content
of the poem). BOTH papers must be original interpretations,
and they should indicate that the student has carefully
considered and attempted to answer questions raised in class
or during lectures. One can prepare for the writing process
by
a.) reviewing one's reading log and lecture notes from class
b.) formulating arguments or debatable
claims (i.e. theses) about the literary texts
c.) deciding on which arguments
elicit the greatest interest
d.) re-reading those passages in
the text that will help one to argue one's thesis
e.) keeping an open mind and taking
risks with one's ideas
Papers should be 5-6 pages in length, should be written
using proper essay structure, and must be submitted on time.
Also,
a.) use standard 8-1/2" x 11" paper (white), and
12 point font (double spaced)
b.) include a title page, on which you will type the title
of your paper, your name, the name or number of the course,
and the date. Do not number this title page, but number
the pages of your paper consecutively, starting with 1
c.) allow margins of l-1/2" on the left-hand edge of
each page and 1" on the other three edges. (Note: most
word processors provide you with this standard.)
d.) submit a final draft that is clean or without revisions
which might have occurred in early drafts. Make sure the
paper is stapled only ONCE on the upper left corner.
Final Exam ... 25%: The
final (March 18`h) will be an ESSAY EXAM. Students should demonstrate their understanding of cumulative
material (e.g. application of literary terms from M.H. Abrams'
A Glossary), but they should also manage the
task of writing two essays in the allotted time. Six questions
will be distributed in advance to help students prepare
for the exam.
REQUIRED
READING:
-Selections from Fiction: A Pocket Antholosv
(Third Edition); course READER (Available at
Grafikart, 6550 Pardall
in Isla Vista); The God of Small Things (a
novel, Arundhati Roy); selections
from London Kills Me by
Hanif Kureishi
(Penguin, 1992); A Glossary of Literar~Terms
(7d' Ed, M.H. Abrams).
IMPORTANT REMINDERS:
Attendance
and Participation: Your participation grade depends
on your regular attendance. The frequency with which we
meet over the quarter provides us with the opportunity to
engage in discussion, and this interaction with each other
helps us to generate responses to the challenging questions
the course poses.
Although classes will often begin
with a short lecture, I expect you to take an active role
in class discussions and group work. "Active"
participation means that you are willing to take risks with
your ideas while you attempt to present an informed opinion
about a work. You can demonstrate that you are "active"
by answering questions that I pose to the class, engaging
in class discussions, expressing your views freely in small
groups, sharing with the class your insights about the readings,
and (if you know yourself to be particularly shy) discussing
with me the class material either via email or during my
office hours.
I will give you ONE excused absence
during the quarter: for this SINGLE absence, I will require
no explanation or physician's note. However, subsequent
absences will lower your grade, the logic being that you
cannot prove to me your enthusiasm for learning if you are
not present in the classroom. I encourage you to save your
ONE "free" absence for unexpected illness or emergency.
Furthermore, you are responsible for whatever material you
missed, including handouts, assignments, and announcements.
Only after you have made an attempt to catch up with the
course material will I answer questions concerning missed
classes. Please do not email me with requests for missed
material.
Plagiarism: Plagiarism is a crime. Materials
submitted to fulfill academic requirements must represent
a student's own efforts. Please read carefully Charles Bazerman's essay on "Plagiarism" in your Reader.
Additional information can be obtained at XXX, or
XXX . Realize that I will deal harshly
with any suspicious activity. If you have questions, see
me during my office hours or send me an email.
SYLLABUS:
January 8: -intro to instructor, readings, and assignments; diagnostic
essay (based on overhead prompt of a quotation from Cardinal
Newman's The Idea of the University); terms from A Glossary of Literary Terms (Abrams)
include "connotation/denotation", "figurative"
vs. "literal" meaning
January 15: -"Paul's Case"
(Cather 94-113);
"Eveline"
(Joyce 113-117); "A Small, Good Thing"
(Carver 304-326); terms from A Glossary of Literary
Terms (Abrams) include "naturalism", "characterizing" (showing/telling, round/flat),
"epiphany", point of view ("limted
omniscience"), tragedy ("sympathy/empathy",
"pathos/ethos"); sections from Aristotle's The Poetics (READER
161-174)
17: -"The Rocking Horse Winner" (Lawrence 115-132); "Psychological and
Psychoanalytic Criticism" (A Glossary Abrams
247-253), also "motif' (repetition); for help with
your papers, read "Making a Mark" (Bartholomae
et al.) in your READER 175-182.
January 22: = "Vandals" (Munro 271-303); "Where are you Going,
Where have you Been?" (Oates
327-343); "Happy Endings" (Atwood 344-347); "Feminist
Criticism" (A Glossary Abrams 88-94), also from
A Glossary "allusion" (popular, i.e. Bob
Dylan), "mimesis" (representations of women)
24: -"Sweat" (Hurston 142-153); "A
Party Down at the Square" (Ellison 228-234); "Everyday
Use" (Walker 362-370); "Barbie-Q" (Cisneros
410-411); terms from Abrams' A Glossary include "point
of view" (first-person participant), "narratology"
(implied reader/audience and, at times, a fictional "you")
January 29: -from the course READER: "Poetic Meter...
" and "Metrical Variations" (Fussell);
"The Flea" (Dome); "Upon Julia's Clothes"
(Herrick); "To His Coy Mistress" (Marvell); terms
you should know are "scansion", "rhythm",
"accent", "prosody", "poetic feet"
(memorize only iamb, trochee, and spondee... and their effects
on a poem's meaning), meter, caesura and its effects, and
substitution or metrical variation and its effects; terms
from Abrams' A Glossarv include
"tone", "diction", "carpe diem",
"courtly love", "imagery" (five senses,
also "kinesthetic" imagery), effect of "triplets"
(Herrick), allusions (biblical, classical, courtly love),
"ironic understatement" (figure of speech)
31: Matthew Arnold's poems and prose (READER); terms from
Abrams' A Glossary include "lyric", "figures
of speech" (metaphor, simile, personification, apostrophe
["thou lonely heart"], and invocation); classical
"allusion", looking for "double meanings"
of words, "paradox" ("longing like despair"),
changing mood/tone of speaker ("pathetic fallacy")
February 5: "PAPER #1" IS DUE!!!
-finish discussion of Arnold; begin Thomas Hardy's
Poems (READER); terms from Abrams' A Glossary
include "paradox" as a theme (how can hope
and desolation coexist?), "figures of speech"
10: -Fiction: A Pocket Anthology... "Introduction"
(1-20); "Young Goodman Brown" (Hawthorne 31-43);
"An Upheaval" (Chekhov 73- 80); terms
from A Glossary of Literary Terms (Abrams) include
"allegory", the "story"Ithe
"tale", "plot", "setting",
"point of view" (omniscient third-person), "modern
short story", "in medias res", "interior monologue", "realism",
"naturalism", "theme" (of class consciousness);
"irony"
7: -finish with Hardy; discuss poetry of Alfred Lord Temyson
and Robert Browning (READER),
); terms from Abrams' A Glossary include
"dramatic monologue" (Browning) and "persona"
(Tennyson's "Ulysses")
February 12: -discuss poetry of W.B.
Yeats; begin discussion of poetry from Unsettling`
America (READER); also read the section called
"Ethnic Studies and the Postcolonial Approach"
(also from the course READER); ); terms from Abrams' A Glossary include
"metonymy" (also a figure of speech), "symbol"
(Byzantium), "alliteration", "invocation"
14: finish discussion of multicultural
poetry from Unsettling_ America; read "Who
is Ethnic?" (Werner Sollors
READER)
February
19: MIDTERM!!!
21: The God of Small Things (Arundhati
Roy); "The Story"
and
"The Plot" (E.M. Forster, in the course READER);
"Form and Genre" (Seymour Chatman, in the
course READER)
Februrary 26: Roy; read "Orientalism"
(Said, READER)
28: Roy; also read "The Gendering
of Critical Discourse" (READER)
March 5: "PAPER #2" IS
DUE!!!; read "Semiotics of Theatrical Performance" (Eco,
in the course READER); "A Preface to
Drama" (in the course READER); also read
The Sandbox (Edward Albee, in the course READER); "theatre
of the Absurd" (Abrams, 1)
7: begin discussion of "The Alchemy of Happiness" and "London
Kills Me" (in Hanif Kureishi's London Kills Me 267-353); discuss Kureishi's screenplay; we will also watch sections of the
film "London Kills Me" and compare the visual
product with Kureishi's written text.
March 12: finish discussion of Kureishi; also,
I will distribute the final exam questions (you will prepare
answers to all six, but I will choose four questions from
which you will answer two on the day of the exam... closed
book).
14: review
March 18: FINAL EXAM
English 10/ Blau
Fall 2001
The Interpretive Project:
Poetry
For this project you are
to take on an interpretively difficult or problematic poem
(or passage in a poem) and write a brief paper presenting
the interpretive problem and exploring possible solutions.
Ideally, in the course of working on this paper you will
resolve the problem in a way that is satisfying for you
and convincing to your reader. However, it is possible --
even likely -- that your work on the problem will advance
your understanding of the problem and clarify its dimensions
for your reader, but that your paper will still not reach
any conclusion that might be called a solution or resolution
for the problem you have examined.
This project and the study
it entails will be completed in 2 stages, with each stage
yielding a paper or a draft of a paper. The two stages of
the project are described below.
Stage 1. The first stage of the project requires you to write
an interpretive paper as described above on one of the seven
poems listed below (all in our anthology). Your choice of
a poem will be complicated, however, by the need to join
a group of four to six students all of whom are required
to agree on the one poem from the list that all the members
of your small group will write about (or form your group
with class members who come to class already interested
in the same poem you want to write about from the list below).
However you form your group with members who will be writing
about the same poem, your job will be to write your paper
and bring it with you to class on the specified date (see
below) with copies for every member of your group (and one
for your instructor). At that point you and the members
of your group will read and respond to each other's papers
and discuss the poem at length within your group during
the class period.
In completing the paper for stage 1 you will not be expected
to engage in any library research or use web-based resources
(though there is no prohibition against them), but it would
be wise to read the biographical sketch of your author at
the back of our anthology and some additional poems by the
same author. Stage 1 paper due Mon Oct. 29.
Read all 7 of the eligible poems for this assignment
as carefully as possible, so you'll know what poems you'd
prefer to write about at the class meeting on Mon. Oct 22,
where groups will be formed. The eligible poems (all in
our anthology and on our syllabus) are the following:
John Donne, "The Flea"
Andrew Marvell, "To His Coy Mistress"
Robert Browning, "My Last Duchess"
Robinson Jeffers, "Carmel Point"
Robert Frost, "Birches"
Langston Hughes, "Theme for English B"
Stanley Kunitz, "Touch Me"
Stage
2. This stage asks you to revise your paper in any way
that you think will strengthen it, but with the one additional
requirement that you now draw upon one or more of the papers
written by your colleagues to support or clarify or stand
in contrast to your own ideas about the poem. In other words,
you are obliged to acknowledge in your paper the existence
of a body of writing by your colleagues about the same poem
you are explicating and to incorporate the ideas of your
colleagues (at least one of them and preferably more) into
your paper, either to illuminate or support some point you
wish to make or to show a contrasting
or opposing point of view. You may quote from your colleague's
paper or paraphrase or summarize what he or she has written,
acknowledging your sources by using parenthetical abbreviated
citations within your text and list
of references at the end. (Conventions and forms for citation
will be discussed in class, well before the due date). Stage
2 paper due Mon. Nov. 5.
English 10/ Blau
Fall 2001
Interpretive or Critical Paper on Short
Fiction
Your final paper will be on one of the assigned short
stories (or possibly a pair of stories) in our short story
anthology. The story you write about must be one that is
selected by at least two other members of the class who
will serve as your discussion group. You may explore any
problem raised for you as a reader of the text or raised
through class discussion or your reading about the story
or its author. Or you may write an interpretive or critical
paper on the story, offering simply to help a reader read
it more deeply or comprehensively or pleasurably. Or you
may want to advance some idea you have about the story or
reflect on some idea you find advanced or illustrated by
the story.
Any of the
following stories (among others) would serve especially
well for this assignment:
Carver, "Cathedral"
or "What We Talk About..."
Lawrence, "The
Rocking Horse Winner"
LeGuin,
".... Omelas"
Flannery O'Connor,
any of the three stories in the anthology
Gilman, "The
Yellow Wallpaper"
Whatever issue you address
or problem you explore in your paper, please be certain
to do some reading about the story or its author or context
and make some use of your reading in your essay. You may
read any of the supplementary readings in our anthology
-- readings that were included to illuminate the stories--
or you may use other resources that you find in journals
or in books about the author or the story. The idea is simply
to make sure that your essay is informed in some way by
your engagement in a conversation that begins with discussions
with members of our class, but then also includes perspectives
available through the wider and more carefully constructed
conversations that are represented by the body of literature
about literature. Be sure to cite all your sources (parenthetically)
when you draw on or refer to them in the body of your paper.
Also identify them more fully in a list of works cited at
the end of your paper.
You
will need to read a number of potential selections during
the week of November 5t" so that you can join a discussion
group on Mon. Nov. 12 and select the story you will write
about. Then on Wed. Nov. 14 you will need to bring ideas
for your paper (and some draft paragraphs and notes) to
class to discuss with your colleagues in your group. Your completed paper is due during the
week of November 19, any time prior to the Thanksgiving
holiday.
English
10
Diana
Solomon
Topics
for Paper 2
Directions: Choose one of the following topics
and write a 45 page essay. The essay should be based around
a thesis statement that is clear and controversial, and
the body of the essay should be focused around proving the
thesis. **Include your notes and previous drafts, like last
time.
Choice 1: Pick a passage of approximately
15-45 lines from either Lysistrata
or The Country Wife. Analyze it as you would
a poem, paying attention to figurative elements. Include
a copy of the passage. Develop a thesis statement about
the passage's meaning(s). Finally, consider what larger
issues of the play the passage represents?
Suggested
passages from The Country Wife:
•III, ii, lines 591-646 (the "breeches" scene)
*IV, ii, lines 100-189 (Margery's
letter to Homer) -IV, iii, lines 198-262 (the "china"
scene)
Choice 2:
What is funny, and why? Choose either Lysistrata or The Country Wife, analyze
the comic elements, and then develop a thesis statement
about the nature of the play's comedy. What purposes does
the comedy seem to serve?
Choice 3: Homer
arranges for people to engage in sex, whereas Lysistrata arranges for sex to be withheld. How does each
gain the ability to influence a large number of characters,
in order to wield this type of power? Choose a quotation
or two from each play, and do a close reading of the quotations
in order to determine how Homer and Lysistrata obtain their power. How are their methods different,
and are they at all similar?
Pasternack New Historicist
Essay Engl 10-W99
General Instructions:
Write an essay in which you demonstrate how a literary
text (or cluster of two to three short texts) and a nonliterary
text draw upon certain cultural ideas and/or reshape those
ideas or how they try to resolve a conflict in-the culture
concerning certain cultural ideas. You may
center your essay on Hughes's or Silko's writing.
• A concept you might concentrate on that
was (and is still) under contestation is the construction
of American identities-African American identity, American
Indian identity, or the construction of American identity
in a society many think of as multi-racial and multi-ethnic,
or you might choose another category on which to focus your
analysis.
• In any case, your thesis will either be
about
• how the
particular literary and non-literary texts contribute to
the construction of a significant cultural concept . (basically a comparison essay)
or
• how recognizing that this cultural concept
was being constructed in a certain way can illuminate ways
that the literary text(s) contribute to or contest that
construction (an essay which forefronts the Hughes or Silko
text, as Lynn's forefronts the Cheever
story).
Specific Requirements:
• If you write
about Hughes, focus your analysis on
• one poem by Hughes that we have-not
discussed in great detail in class (two or at most three
if they are short and closely related). These may be from
the Harlem Renaissance period or from Montage of a Dream
Deferred, written in the late 1940s.
• and one
other, non-literary text from the "Hughes" section
of your Reader. (If there is another text you wish to write
about instead, see me about it first.) This other text should
be from the same period as the Hughes poem(s). Append to
your essay a one-page abstract of the text not written by
Hughes.
• If you write
about Silko, focus your analysis
on
• one section of Storyteller (or two closely related sections)
• and another, non-literary text on issues of American Indian
education and assimilation on Reserve for our class in the
Library. As most of these are books, you will need to select
a section on which to focus your analysis. Note the date
of this text in relation to the date when Storyteller
was published.
• Be sure that
the vast majority of your paper consists in close reading
of these primary materials,
• for the poem or other literary text, analyzing the contributions
that -image, metaphor; layout, rhythm„ point
of view, and other such concrete details make to constructing
the idea,
• for the non-literary text, analyzing such
details as diction, tone, order of points, and assumptions,
as well as imagery and even metaphors as they contribute
to the construction of the idea;
• Do not begin your essay with generalizations
about the period (see Lynn, p. 114, for a list of assumptions red ected by New Historicisms). Do not make the essay about
Hughes the man or Hughes the poet, Silko
the woman or Silko the writer
(follow the directions for New Historicism, not for Biographical
Criticism).
To do the two close readings adequately and make
explicit your reasoning about them, you will need to write
at least 5 pp. Do not go over 7 pp.
• Document your sources, using MLA-style citations;
that is, use brief parenthetical citations and a "Works
Cited" list at the end of your essay. See Lynn's examples in his biographical criticism essay (pp.
135-9) and the pamphlet, Success in En 1' ish
Courses, as well as the MLA Handbook for Writers
of Research Papers (available at the Reference Desk
in the library) and the Web site linked to "Resources"
on our class page if you need more information. You will
find full bibliographic information for the pieces -in the
Reader in the table of contents. Be sure to document the
literary as well as the other texts you, discuss
Your first draft is due on the Web 5 p.m.,
Wed., March I0.
Comments are due Fri., Mar. 12.
Revised essay is due Mon., Mar. 15
Your file name should be "<first three letters of your last name>3.htm".
Publish it under your group name and then "p3."
Your comments should have the file name "<first
three letters of author's last name><first three letters
of your last - name> htm".
Publish them under your group name and then "p3."
Pasternack
Explication Essay
Intro to Lit-W99
First Draft Due: Friday, 1/29, on the Web (I will be available 3-5 in Pentium 333 Lab).
Comments Due on Draft 1: Thursday, 214, on the Web
Second Draft Due: Monday, 218, on the Web
Format: Consult Success in English Courses for standard
guidelines about margins, spacing, etc.
Length: 4-5 pp.
Purpose: To analyze a poem using all that you have learned
about how poems express meaning through literal statement,
figurative language; and elements of sound. To then write
an essay that argues a New Critical thesis about the meaning
and structure of the poem and that also shows your interest
in the poem and conveys. that interest
to your readers.
Content: Having chosen a poem from the poetry anthology that
we have not discussed extensively it class:
- Argue a thesis about
the poem's meaning and use evidence about how that meaning
is conveyed by the poem to back up your thesis.
- Work within the principles
of New Criticism, as explained by Lynn and stated by Wimsatt.
- Be as specific as you can in your thesis and
in your argument.
- Include interpretation of metaphor(s), using
the terminology of "tenor" and "vehicle"
as appropriate and, if you like, using Ricoeufs
ideas of how metaphor works. May also include analysis
of metonymy; synecdoche, symbol, personification, or other
appropriate figurative language.
- Include some analysis
ofhow the "music".
of the poem (rhythm, alliteration,
assonance, and rhyme are possible elements to include
as appropriate) help to convey the poem's meaning and
attitude.
- Title your essay with a phrase that gives some
indication of your thesis about which you are writing.
- Include
as an addendum
a line-by-line,
literal translation of the poem (the literal analysis
should not be a part of the essay itself except insofar
as explanation of the literal level furthers your argument).
UPLOAD YOUR ESSAY INTO YOUR GROUP'S WEB SITE. Your file should be named with the first three letters
of your last name and then "1, as in "pas1'".
The location should be: ftp:
//archserve.
id. ucsb. edu/groupname/pi/. Be sure to include the final slash (but no period
at the end--that's my sentence period). Put a print copy in my mailbox.
Peer Review
Sheet for Decades Project
Writer's Name/Reviewer's Name
Title of Paper
Read your classmate's paper carefully. Then answer the following
questions, explaining your responses. (Keep in mind that
it is more important to provide the writer with useful feedback
that will help improve the paper than to avoid hurting her
or his feelings.)
1. Does the first paragraph of the paper act as a brief summary of the
entire essay? If not, tell that what is missing.
2. Does the introduction (the first few paragraphs)
of the paper tell us what argument the writer is making
about epistemic shifts -- changes in thinking -- that occurred
as a result of the events they are describing, and the impact
on Coming of Age in the Americas? If not, tell the author how they might get this information
into the first few paragraphs of the paper, or restructure
the entire paper.
3.
Does the writer include information from a variety of reliable
sources? Does he or she properly introduce, cite, and analyze,
summarize, or paraphrase each source? If not, help them
do this.
4.
Do the transitions in the paper take us from one event or
thought to the next in a graceful manner? If not help the
writer bring themes and ideas together
coherently.
6.
Overall, is the entire paper subjective? Does the writer give his or her own opinion in the form
of an argument that they back up with evidence and examples?
If there is no argument evident, help the writer develop
one.
8. To what extent is the
paper well-written? Mark unclear or awkward
sentences.
9. Circle, but do not correct any grammatical or spelling
errors. In particular, be alert for the following problems:
CS
comma splice
frag sentence
fragment
agr lack
of agreement between subject and verb (e.g., singular subject,
plural verb form), noun and pronoun
DM danglingmodifier
SP spelling error
11. What are the paper's strengths? What do you like about it? What
do you think is well done?
12. What should the writer do to improve the paper?
RATE EACH SECTION ON A SCALE OF 1 (LOW) TO 5 (HIGH).
/
5: Unity The
TOPIC of the essay is clear and appears AT THE BEGINNING
OF THE PAPER. EVERYTHING IN THE ESSAY EXPLAINS THE TOPIC,
not some other point.
/ 5: Coherence/Organization EACH PARAGRAPH BEGINS WITHA TOPIC OR TRANSITION SENTENCE.
Paragraphs in the essay are in the right order, and sentences
within each paragraph are also in the right order. TRANSITIONS
and transitional devices between sentences and paragraphs
are adequate.
/ 5: Development EVERYTHING
IS FULLYEXPLAINED; the writer has told you everything you
feel you need to know to understand the topic of the essay.
/ 5: Style The
writer's views are expressed clearly and as simply as possible,
in PLAIN ENGLISH, with no apparent effort to impress by
using big words, excessively long sentences, pretentious
forms of expression. THE WRITER TENDS TO USE HUMAN SUBJECTS,
STRONG VERBS, AND ACTIVE (NOT PASSIVE) SENTENCES.
/ 5: Mechanics The
essay is well prepared, expressed in standard written English
with generally accepted SPELLING, GRAMMAR, and PUNCTUATION.
Resource Description |
| Author/Artist: |
Media: |
| Date of Composition: |
Dimensions: |
| Original Course: |
Bibliographic Information: |
| Description: |
Location of Artifact: |
| Category: |
Date of Publication/Exhibition: |
| Period/MA Field: |
Keywords: |
|