Social Science
Paper Peer Review
Please comment on the following aspects of your peers paper
Your Name:
Writers Name:
Title: Give an alternate suggestion for an appropriate title.
Introduction:
Is the history of this issue clear?
Does the researcher explain why the topic was worth researching?
Is any previous research cited? What is it?
What is the researchers hypothesis?
Methods:
Does the researcher explain the procedure clearly?
Could you perform this exact experiment with these instructions? Why or why
not?
What population is being surveyed?
Survey:
Read through the survey for this paper. Do you see any leading questions?
Note any potential biases for the researcher.
Results - Textual and Visual:
Did the results support the hypothesis?
Is the textual representation of the result easy to follow?
Are the graphics clear and relevant?
Are good quotes chosen?
Is the language here entirely objective?
Discussion:
Is the analysis logical? Interesting?
Does the researcher take into account
How is this section related to the introduction?
The hypothesis?
What were some unusual findings?
Give the researcher a question for future study.
Present a limiting factor.
Conclusion:
Is the experiment closed effective?
How has it contributed to the larger debate?
References: Cite your resources using APA documentation (see Hacker
365).
Extra Credit:
Does the author have extra credit articles? Are they relevant?
Is proper APA format used for the references?
General:
What is the papers strongest point?
How would you improve the paper?
Abstract: Write a one paragraph abstract for the experiment on the back
of this sheet.
Resource Description |
| Author/Artist: Melissa Stevenson |
Media: |
| Date of Composition: Winter 2001 |
Dimensions: |
| Original Course: Writing 2 |
Bibliographic Information: |
| Description: Social Science Paper Peer Review
Sheet |
Location of Artifact: |
| Category: Instructor's Materials |
Date of Publication/Exhibition: |
| Period/MA Field: N/A |
Keywords: writing, peer review, social science
unit |
|